
- posted from iPhone
Location:Oaxaca City
adventure journal with some politics and cultural observations
The bill killers are essentially the 2009 version of the 2008 PUMAs, that whacky species of supporters of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign who, once Barack Obama won the nomination, shouted “Party Unity, My Ass,” and engaged in a summer-fall effort to convince Democratic Clinton voters to stay home in November or vote for the McCain-Palin ticket. They of course failed miserably, as the exit polls and hard results demonstrated on election night. Then, as now, both groups deny there is a racial component to their attack. Others of us can spot it a mile away. But there ain’t much use arguing about that because you either see it or you don’t.There's something wrong with that guy. I'm going to email Dennis Perrin and ask him to comment on Al.
Hard work is a prison sentence only if it does not have meaning. Once it does, it becomes the kind of thing that makes you grab your wife around the waist and dance a jig.
You see, her sentence doesn't marginalize unmarried people or gays or lesbians or the differently abled or people with their loved ones in Iraq or people that have loved ones but aren't in a relationship relationship. Don't you all feel better now?
"Once it does, it becomes the kind of thing worth celebrating."
It also assumes one's wife is cool with being randomly grabbed and danced at. Maybe she is, maybe she isn't...
I also have a problem with the construction of, "Hard work is a prison sentence only if it does not have meaning." Hard work is also a prison sentence if you are sentenced to prison. In which case you have probably been stripped of your rights, and forced to work for someone else's profit.
It's possible that he was only referring to dancing a jig with his own wife. Scholarly writers in the English language at least are trained against using subjective language. (this commenter actually seems semi-sane).
(but of course the sane comment had to be followed by this) What is the point of writing a book intended for all audiences if the writer doesn't consider everyone to be his audience? Might as well write "FOR STRAIGHT MEN ONLY" on the cover and call it a day.
Actually, to be really offended keep in mind "the exception that proves the rule", i.e., that the work a typical "wife" (child-rearing, laundry, cooking, cleaning, etc.) is not "work". to which one would conceive of as meaningful, and, thus, jig-inducing
(and from the Queen Bee McEwan) It's possible that he was only referring to dancing a jig with his own wife.
OFFS. Except that's not what's on the page. And if it were, I wouldn't have written this post.